Sunday, September 25, 2005

[The Limit] Restart

I’ve finished brainstorming solutions for A3 & gotten answers from Ray Van Beynen about specific AOS issues, like their procedures and language. Now I’m finally sitting down to rewrite the script – and for a while I was in a whole new realm of procrastination

Reluctant to finish the script – possibly daunted at the amount of work in front of me. Uncertain about whether I should only be roughing out solutions to all the scenes or fixing everything as I go.

The most important thing was to make a decision – maybe not to finish the whole thing (that seems too remote at the moment) but at least to complete work on this first act. So I went through the whole script & ABC’d the scenes - to see what required totally new scenes (A) , significant edits (B) or minor rewrites (C).

There are 90 sequences to edit. 42% of them are totally new A-scenes. Almost half of them are in Act 1 (80% of them are in either A1 or A3).

… Enough numbers. While knowing what’s going on hasn’t totally eliminated my fear, it’s given me a way forward. I just going to read the C-scenes. For B-scenes, I’ll brainstorm 20 ideas for each problem they present (to give me some options when I go through the full rewrite). A-scenes, though, need a full Stakes & Conflicts workup and then have to be Beat-by-Beaten out.

Saturday, September 24, 2005

CBIP

I just finished The Analyst by John Katzenbach, one of those thrillers that's so readable & hooky that I develop an obsession about finishing.

Now I'm re-reading How to Get Things Done (David Allen).

24 4.4 & 4.5

4.4 (** ½ )

Well, that was ludicrous – Jack robbing a gas station? – but still tense, a weird mix that’s tilting towards implausibility.

Also, an evil character (Driscoll) was instantly sympathized by the reveal that she has a schizophrenic daughter – a little soap-opery but also creating a conflict between home & work (classic 24).

4.5 (** ½ )

The problem with this show is that it’s taught us to be suspicious of characters. Being suspicious of characters is not conducive to empathizing with their plight (I’m constantly looking for double levels to what they’re saying and also for evidence they’re traitors).

This ep was nothing special – but its cliffhanger set up a great start to next week: Jack has 10 minutes to rescue his girlfriend before the missiles hit the base.

Wednesday, September 21, 2005

How to Prepare for Disaster

AlphaGeek over at DailyKos has a 5 part series (very in-depth) on disaster preparedness. Who will join me in my apoca-fetish?

[RPG] The Dogs read the fine print

More Dogs last night. More sympathetic characters I enjoyed playing, more discussions about our own morality on the van ride home. Thanks to Mike for lending me this game.

Again, character generation took a wee while. I think it might be good to just devote a whole evening to that if I run Dogs again - give people a chance to feel comfortable with the setting and each other & to come up with solid ideas for their characters at their own pace - rather than me rushing them through it in order to get onto the next town.

The town in question was Livingstone Branch, a reasonably large community that finds itself in the middle of a war between two rival newspapers. Most fun moment of the night for me was the confrontation was Sister Marie, one of the publishers. Wayne thought that it would be a simple matter of lecturing Sister Marie and getting her to admit she was contributing to the problem. I decided Marie would never admit such a thing. It was a full-on social conflict that Celeste backed out of halfway through - in a move that I thought was awesome for her character - and it left Wayne realising he had no way to win unless he drew his gun on this woman. He wasn't prepared to so he had to abide.

Conflicts were less frequent in the session and (I think) more meaningful. We had 2 - maybe because there were more players or maybe because I took to heart the advice in the rules to either say yes or roll the dice. However, my new rule of thumb is that if the Dogs ever disagree, that's worth starting a conflict over.

Each of the Dogs has been loaded with enough issues that I can create at least one town for each of them that plays right to their concerns. Hope I get a chance to continue running this game.

[RPG] Dogs in the 'Verse

Warning – this post is extremely RPG-geeky and pretty much for my own reference.

I had another cool experience with Dogs in the Vineyard last night. I'll write that up later on, but in the meantime a lot of people have been figuring out how to convert Dogs to run a game set in the Firefly universe. Things start here with Dogs in the Black, especially Vincent’s message from here:

... the Firefly folks are all the time landing in a little town and pronouncing judgement upon its sins. The Train Job, Heart of Gold, Jaynestown, Safe, Shindig... right?

Ditch the Faith, that's easy. Instead of Dogs the PCs are space outlaws, no problem. For initiatory conflicts you can do conflicts about how they became part of the crew.

Then just do what they did on the show: everywhere they go, a) there's something there they need to accomplish; b) they know somebody; c) people want things from them; d) the things they want are all contradictory and problematic. You can easily use the game's town creation rules for that.

Dial the supernatural down to nothing, except for River, but still use the demonic influence, sorcery and possession rules. Like I say, demons and sorcerers are just bad luck and bastards. Every Western needs those

I predict that it'd be grimmer, tenser, and less flip than the show - on account of the game's pacing and escalation dynamics - but fundamentally similar.


That led to a sequel thread, Firefly in the Vineyard with some thoughts on character creation. Kitbashing & The Faith talks more about town creation,

With a comment from Vincent here about who the characters need to be

And Sydney’s follow-up thought about the same topic, in a different thread

Tuesday, September 20, 2005

[Film] Serenity

*** (out of 5)
(That's a provisional rating - to be revised after I watch it in better viewing conditions.)

First, to quote from Pearce ...

If anyone tries to tell you ANYTHING about the movie, stop at nothing to prevent them. Kill without hesitation if they persist. Let nothing stop you from seeing this movie without spoilers.

Bring your knowledge of the tv series and NOTHING else. Resist all urge to read up on it. This movie has real impact. Two words could spoil it all.

Right? This'll be spoiler-light, but still ...

Firefly - and now Serenity - loves its characters. As a result, the movie initially delivers an entertaining meandering mess of a story that gradually tightens up into a creepy, smart & funny SF actioner. It's a film that, I think, completely changes the nature of the story of Firefly.

I loved hanging out the cast again, seeing them pushed to extremes and hearing lines that were funny because of who was delivering them rather than the fact that they're funny. Plus I came away from the film sad at how much had been wrapped up. Given all that, I have no idea if it'll play for people who hadn't seen the TV show.

Structurally, like I said: it opens as a bit of a mess. Perhaps because of River's status for much of the first half of the film, at points the story seems like a collection of unmotivated set pieces. Until I read the shooting script, I found it hard to put the events together in my head. Now I see that instead of action it was grounding us in the characters - and the structure's odd breaks in momentum were due to having to keep its antagonist offscreen. From reading the script, it seems obvious that Whedon reintroduced the Operative as soon as he naturally could.

So instead Serenity spends its time introducing the big concepts of Reavers and River. It gives us a powerful new character that puts Firefly fans in the position of newbies - and then delivers plot developments I never thought you could ever possibly do to the crew and to us.

Oh yeah, and I was sitting right at the front of the theatre on the far left, so I can't make any comments about the visuals and staging of the big bang-bang sequences. I can however say with complete confidence that I got a headache. But Joss seems to be best at drawing out character and tension, not so much with the action. I'll rewatch the film when it comes out on general release to update that opinion.

But onto what's good ...

There's an intro that busts through four layers of reality, that gives us a real insight into River's fragmented mind.
Characters are incredibly well motivated and makes supersmart decisions.
There's a visit to a creepy planet.
The bond between Simon and River.
Kaylee's sex life.
Mal's attitude about how to be a captain.
And now it becomes clear that Zoe is kind of a metaphor for the frontier, while Inara represents the alliance.

Conclusion: I want to see a sequel, but one that focuses even further on the crew's life & relationships rather than some big external action plot.

Saturday, September 17, 2005

I want the new Fly My Pretties CD right now!

But it's not out till November 15th. And yet, the show I just went to was so awesome, for so many reasons, that hopefully I'll be able to have it play in my memory till then.

Reasons for awesomness:
My bro was playing bass in it and he's a rock star.
I got to make monkey noises during a surf-rocking singalong.
They played my favourites, like Champion & Let's Roll & Lucky.
They played new stuff.

New stuff like Night of the Owl and Miracles and King of You All and Clarity and, and, let's just say we'll be singing along to these tracks too. And let's also say that Hollie Smith is going to be a frickin' superstar. A gentle mix of Jo Randerson, Anika Moa, Patti Smith, Aretha Franklin and The Clash. Watch out for her stuff.

All the songs created those moments for me where I felt suspended in the music. The rational brain shuts off and I'm just lost in the moment, travelling out into uncharted territory. I love that shit. It's like magic.

It's also great to hear Kiwi accents just thrust out there, front and centre, with no apologies - and to realise these songs are telling stories not just about us, but about me, about where I'm at right now. I love that shit too.

Friday, September 16, 2005

[Biz] Setting up for Business

There are a few final steps to before setting your business in motion ...

Factor in any student loan repayments.
Figure out depreciation on assets.
Figure out what can be deducted.
Quantify existing sales by customer.
Prepare a cash flow forecast.
Calculate when you will break even.
Write your business plan.
Decision: is your business plan convincing?

Now it's time to put everything into action.

Make a list of all your tax obligations.
Make sure you have accounted for Terminal tax and Provisional tax (on more than $2,500 profit).
For each business, create a transaction account and a tax account.
Call the IRD and inform them that you are setting up as a sole trader.
Alternatively, set up a company.
Register for GST if necessary.
Put yourself on the two-month return period for GST.
It are eligible, apply for an Enterprise Allowance Grant.

And then start running your business ...

Set up a cash book (either a hard copy or in Excel).
Create a monthly statement of financial performance (basically this is income minus expenses equals profit).
Start a petty cash book.
Set up a filing system for your records.
Established a routine for regular record keeping (I'd prefer to do it mid and at the end of the week).
If you make a profit, set aside 20% for tax purposes.
Backup your data.

And that's at least the spine of what you need to do.

[Biz] Getting the details for business

These next steps are all about finding out the specific information you need. Completely ignored in all this is product development.

Do you need any other team members (accountants, lawyers, employees)?
What are your short, medium and long-term goals (from your SWOT analysis)?

Conduct market research. Connecting with the market and seeing what the demand is are vital steps:
1) what products are around, in what price range?
2) who are your customers?
3) how can you build a relationship with them?
4) what sort of things are they buying?
5) what's the niche market?

List who your customers are.
Identify potential buyers.
Research other markets (via the Internet, trade magazines).
Build client relationships.
Brainstorm how you will market and promote your product.
Decide how you will follow-up with your customers.*
Do a competitor analysis.**
Talk to the Business Information Taxation Officers at the Inland Revenue about GST, PAYE and income-tax.***
Talk to Small Business Advisory Centres. See the Wellington Chamber of Commerce.
Decide on trading structure: sole trader, partnership or company.
Make sure you're physically able to deliver the work. That you are healthy enough.

The next list will be all about the final steps before you set up to start trading.

* Books that I own like Choose and Grow Your Business in 90 Days and The 10 Second Internet Manager have ideas for this step.
** See my Business Plan Workbook.
*** This information is available for free. Specifically I want to understand how drawings are accounted for.

[Biz] Preparing for Business

Here's a list of all the actions you could take to set up a business ...

List all the ways you can get income (your revenue streams).
Select one to focus on.
What do you need to get started? A location to work in? A location to sell from?*
Cost your Labour, Overheads & Materials.**
Price your work.
Do a SWOT analysis:
1) list your Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats.
2) develop a contingency plan for dealing with your weaknesses and threats.
3) develop a strategic plan to take advantage of your strengths and opportunities.

* Note to Steve: See “The Business Plan Workbook”, page 13, for this checklist.

** This includes calling ACC, saying what you're doing, that it's part-time and getting an appropriate rate from them. You'll probably be covered initially by Cover Plus Extra ($355 inc GST).

Thursday, September 15, 2005

[RPG] The Dogs ruin 1.5 lives

I ran Dogs in the Vineyard on Tuesday night for Celeste and Wayne. This is a game where you play preacher-cowboys in the Wild West who ride into town, root out the sin & pass judgment on the sinners. The tension and the challenges don't come from fighting or beating up monsters but from making moral judgments about difficult situations.

Character generation and the conflict resolution system took a while to get the hang off. It's a really nice Poker-based mechanic of raising and seeing that makes you ask two questions of every conflict: a) can I win? and b) what does this say about my character? Celeste described as the easiest system she's played with so far.

Wayne and Celeste were confronted with a superficially simple problem (a woman cheating on her husband). What's good about Dogs is that it gave every character involved in that situation extremely sympathetic motivations. I enjoyed making all 3 NPCs as sympathetic as possible and being upfront with Wayne & Celeste about what the NPCs wanted from the them.

Is it my fault that the husband, wife and lover all wanted completely incompatible things? :)


Fascinating to see the differences between Wayne and Celeste trying to figure out a solution. It was 'sort of black & white' vs. 'sort of nuanced'. Wayne's Dog wanted a clear cut solution; Celeste's s Dog wanted to understand the situation so that she could maximise everyone's happiness.

In the end, they annulled a marriage, Celeste's character ruined her uncle's life and neither player felt they'd improved the situation. And we all had a good time (I think!).

What I really liked about the game was that as a GM I felt deeply. This game is more about emotions and connecting with other players than anything I've played in the last couple of years, aside from Buffy.

Tuesday, September 13, 2005

[RPG] I've published another game

This is another entry into the Ronnies, based on the keywords 'Hatred' & 'Girlfriend'. I think it's pretty funny, actually. Hopefully I get a chance to play it soon.

It's called I Love to Hate to Love and you can find it here.

Monday, September 12, 2005

New Orleans - What went wrong

Newsweek's just done a 5 page article about how the Bush administration (mis)-managed the flow of information and failed to respond to the disaster. Some money quotes:

Bush's aides are SO afraid of telling him bad news that they practically drew straws to see who would have to tell him, on TUESDAY, that the hurricane was so bad he'd need to come home.

The reality, say several aides who did not wish to be quoted because it might displease the president, did not really sink in until the Thursday night AFTER it struck.


And another quote:
The denial and the frustration finally collided aboard Air Force One on Friday. As the president's plane sat on the tarmac at New Orleans airport, a confrontation occurred that was described by one participant as "as blunt as you can get without the Secret Service getting involved." Governor Blanco was there, along with various congressmen and senators and Mayor Nagin.

There's a precis of the article, here.

[TV] Is Veronica losing it?

1.12

Putting Veronica in jeopardy is a good idea, but the episode quickly turns into dumb fun. Great Lyn Echolls curveball at the end, though.

1.13

Veronica Mars is the exemplar of teen alienation. Most of her school clients are experiencing different aspects of the same thing, so she can relate to them.

The show seems to be losing its class commentary - which saddens me – focusing more on the OC, glamourous & TV friendly upper-class lifestyles.

However, Lynne Echolls is now a means of drawing Logan & Veronica closer together, the Yolanda disappearance is a means of demonstrating why Logan & Veronica fell out - and the storyline with Yolanda’s parents combines upper & lower classes.

Still, I missed Weevil.

1.12 ***

1.13 ***

Soon, some speculations about where Veronica Mars is heading

Sunday, September 11, 2005

[Script] How to pitch - again

John Rogers over at Kung Fu Monkey is keeping his monkey's kung fu strong with an extensive post on pitching. Lots of interesting looking internal links, too.

[TV] 3 more eps of Veronica Mars

We’re entering into spoiler territory now, baby.

1.9

Best. Teaser. Ever.

Veronica figures out her family’s past & tracks down the guy who’s been following her all in the space of 5 intense minutes.

1.10

Delightful Christmas episode with a real “Who Killed Lily Kane” kick at the end.

1.11

The super-detective I speculated would show up, has shown up. I expect I’ll be watching a lot more VM over the next 2 days.

(What the hell, I’ll give ‘em all 5 stars. I like this show.)

[TV] Veronica Mars 1.8

(I’m loving Josh Kramon's musical score for this show)

Good ep, juggling lots of subplots. The crazy boarder, the purity test, a thawing of the Duncan-Veronica relationship. Good stuff.

And what a chilling, devastating finale in the interview with Koontz. We might as well call this episode, “Let’s destroy Veronica Mars”.

[How to: TV] Multiple Wants

I think I’ve already suggested that characters have Wants. Central objectives that define the reason they’re on the show. Watching Veronica Mars, I’ve become aware that the more Wants a character has, the more dimensions they have – because those Wants can be placed in opposition with each other.

For example, Veronica wants to be accepted, defend her dad, and find out who killed Lily Kane. What if two of those things turn out to be incompatible?

[Biz] Costing & Pricing

At its simplest, the price you charge for an item = (The amount you want to earn in a year DIVIDED by the number of hours you will work in a year) TIMES the number of hours it takes to produce one product / deliver one service.

That’s at its simplest.

The amount you want to earn in a year has several components. The two main ones are the cost of your labour (which is calculated on the personal expenses you want the business to pay for) and the cost of your overheads to run the business.

For example, if I want the business to pay me $30,000 peryhear and I’ll be working 1,314 hours in a year (due to holidays, weekends, downtime) then I need to charge $22.80 per hour for my labour (30K/1,314). One bit of advice: take that figure you want to earn and add 20% to it, to allow for tax.

Overheads work in the same way. If it costs me $5,000 a year to run my business then I need to charge $3.80 per hour to cover those (5K/1,314). And remember, overheads are the expenses that tick over each month regardless of whether you make a sale or not. IOW, they are going to cost you even before you make your first sale.

The cost of materials needs to get passed directly onto the consumer. Let’s say that’s $5.

The total cost of the product = Labour + Overheads + Materials. In the case above, that’s $31.60 an hour.

If you have extra revenue streams (part time jobs, other businesses) then you can reduce the amount you need to draw from the business (which changes the Break-Even Point). Accounting for those is the next step.